Shows like Law and Order and CSI have taught a generation of Americans that blood spatters and handwriting analysis are crucial for catching criminals. The reality, says UCLA School of Law dean Jennifer Mnookin, is that many of these so-called pattern evidence techniques used in forensic science are faulty and not supported by evidence.
In fact, when it comes to wrongful conviction cases (where new DNA evidence proves that someone was innocent), bad forensic science is the second most frequent contributing factor, behind only eyewitness testimony. There are real, and harmful, consequences to forensic science in the courtroom.
The Verge spoke to Mnookin, who recently wrote a paper on the uncertain future of forensic science, about how...
from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/2BAEMBQ
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please let me know