meta content='PcpJKOmoday5SZ2ES5Jk' name='bulletprofit'/> Ayyobpatel.bloggr.com

Followers

Why The Avengers Name Only Starts To Make Sense In Endgame

The MCU has released four Avengers movies thus far, but the team’s name only starts to make sense after Avengers: Infinity War and during the events of Avengers: Endgame.

In Captain Marvel, we learned that Nick Fury came up with the name for the Avengers Initiative through Carol Danvers’ call sign when she was in the Navy. As far as explanations go, that was a neat twist. But as Tony Stark takes a jab at the name in the last movie of the Infinity Saga, Earth’s Mightiest Heroes didn’t really do a whole lot of avenging before the events of Endgame.

When you think about it, the first movie revolved around Loki’s invasion of Earth through the Chitauri. When the God of Mischief wounds Agent Coulson, Fury uses this as a means to motivate the disgruntled band of heroes. But the main reason for them teaming up hardly had anything to do with avenging Coulson. In the sequel, Avengers: Age of Ultron, the dissonance is even stronger. Ultron was a creation of Tony Stark. And he didn’t really cause that much destruction as to compel the heroes to exact retribution.

Even in the threequel, the Avengers are mostly on the defensive; trying to stop the Mad Titan from getting his hands on all the Infinity Stones. In fact, it is after Thanos succeeds in wiping half of all living creatures from existence that the purpose behind the name of the Avengers comes to fruition.

After failing to save the world, twice, Avengers: Endgame shows us the aftermath of that failure by depicting the MCU heroes in a state of defeat and depression. It’s here that the team finally earns their name, though, and puts everything on the line to make things right and take Earth and the universe’s revenge on Thanos, with some of them even playing the ultimate hero card of sacrifice to ensure victory over the Mad Titan.



from Movies – We Got This Covered https://ift.tt/3izwEop

Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman Reportedly Being Eyed For The Flash

Just when things had started looking up for The Flash after spending half a decade stuck in development hell, the domino effect caused by the Coronavirus has seen the Scarlet Speedster’s solo debut pushed back once again. Dune was pulled from this year’s release schedule and sent to the date initially marked for The Batman, causing Matt Reeves’ reboot to head to March 2022, while The Flash will now arrive in November.

That’s eight years and one month after the project was first announced, meaning that star Ezra Miller will have been a part of the DCEU for close to ten years without being given anything to do other than show up for brief cameos and dish out some quips in Justice League. Not that he was shaping up to be the focal point of the movie anyway, with Michael Keaton and Ben Affleck both stealing the headlines after signing on to play alternate versions of Batman.

The latest report could see Miller shunted even further into the background should it end up happening, as Warner Bros. is said to be eying Gal Gadot to show up as Wonder Woman, something we’d heard from our own sources was a possibility. Of course, Diana Prince is also still waiting for her next movie to arrive, as Wonder Woman 1984 was recently delayed to Christmas Day, and might even head straight to streaming.

If The Flash keeps adding cast members that are a lot more famous and recognizable than the title hero, then it could ultimately end up harming the movie as a whole if the big names end up taking too much of the spotlight. Either way, we likely won’t be hearing any concrete news for a while given the latest setback.



from Movies – We Got This Covered https://ift.tt/36DWa9D

Black Widow Reportedly Features Another Original Avenger, Not Iron Man

It looks like another Avenger will be turning up alongside Natasha Romanoff in Black Widowbut not the one that we were expecting. Last year, it was reported that Robert Downey Jr. had filmed a cameo as Tony Stark for the Scarlett Johansson vehicle, which was widely taken as fact. In recent times, though, we haven’t heard too much on this front. But a new rumor points to another of Earth’s Mightiest Heroes returning instead – Jeremy Renner’s Hawkeye.

Insider Amit Chaudhari has claimed on Twitter that a source has told him that Clint Barton will appear in Black Widow. That’s all he can say at the moment, with Chaudhari specifying that it could happen in “a new scene, a flashback scene or a post credit scene.”

In a follow-up tweet, Chaudhari revealed that he’s also tried to dredge up some info on Downey’s role in BW but has found nothing, which has made him “doubtful” that Iron Man really is part of the movie.

Fans have long suspected that Clint could show up. We know that Black Widow will explore Nat’s backstory, so it adds up that we’ll finally get to see what really happened in Budapest – a mission that the pair went on that’s been referenced a lot in the Avengers films. Some think this is where they first met and Clint helped Nat defect from Russia to S.H.I.E.L.D. Alternatively, like Chaudhari says, Hawkeye could appear in a completely different way. Maybe in a scene set post-Endgame where he is mourning his friend’s loss?

Well, we’ve got a long time to theorize about this because, as we’ve all had to accept, Black Widow won’t be arriving this year as intended and is instead hitting cinemas next April. That’s a full year after it was originally supposed to land. At least when it finally does get here, we may get two (or possibly even three) Avengers for the price of one.



from Movies – We Got This Covered https://ift.tt/3jP2pes

Watch: Tremors’ Burt Gummer Announces He’s Running For President

The chaotic free-for-all of the political landscape has only been one aspect of the compounding madness that is 2020, but with the imminent US presidential election, it’s begun dominating public consciousness.

Be it the news of Kanye West announcing his candidacy or the recent debate descending into a fracas of mutual recrimination, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to take the process seriously in spite of the huge weight of import it carries. The next (il)logical step would be for a fictional character to announce that he’s running for the Oval Office, and lo and behold, Tremors‘ Burt Gummer has appeared to do just that.

Burt was not a central face in the horror comedy saga’s beginning, and there was even one point in the first movie where it looked like he and his wife Heather were about to be added to the body count, but his eccentric personality cemented him as a firm favorite among fans and he soon ascended to the de-facto lead. In a video to promote the series’ upcoming seventh installment (see above), Tremors: Shrieker Island, Burt declares his contempt for the presidential air-quotes-candidates and deciding that since those already a part of the system have messed it up, as the “ultimate outsider,” he’s the best person to sort it out.

Burt in the video is somewhat more articulate that he’s often known for, but his statements are certainly within character, as a distrust of the government has always been one of his defining characteristics, and to be honest, the notion of a politician who thinks laterally and speaks without a hint of duplicity would be rather refreshing.

With Burt being a gun-loving survivalist redneck, it would have been easy to make a different point by portraying him as a diehard Republican angered by the imagined danger of The Left coming for his Second Amendment rights. However, his being disgusted by the whole process and everyone involved in it is far closer to how the character would likely react to the chaos in Washington.

With part of the video’s title “Burt For President Episode 1,” this is presumably not the last communication we’ll receive from the secret underground bunker, with further messages being periodically released in the run up to the release of Tremors: Shrieker Island on October 20th.



from Movies – We Got This Covered https://ift.tt/30F9iYw

Netflix Indicted In Texas For Controversial New Movie

When Netflix decided to release a tasteless poster promoting French coming-of-age drama Cuties, they clearly had no idea of the storm that was about to hit them. They might’ve issued a public apology shortly after, but the damage was done and petitions were launched in an attempt to get the film removed from the platform.

Of course, that didn’t work and despite the attempts of many furious subscribers, Cuties arrived when it was supposed to, only to be review bombed and boycotted. In fact, for a while, a lot of people thought the pic would just vanish without a trace as folks looked to avoid it. But in the end, the sheer curiosity factor won out it seems, and the movie managed to crack the Top 10 most-watched list for a few days. In recent weeks, however, the furor has seemingly died down and everyone’s moved on. Or at least, almost everyone.

You see, Netflix isn’t out of the woods just yet. Far from it, in fact, as they’ve now been indicted by the state of Texas. According to Variety, a grand jury indicted the company on a charge of “disseminating lewd material by distributing the film.” Furthermore, they returned the indictment late last month under a state law that forbids “the lewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of an unclothed, partially clothed, or clothed child who was younger than 18 years of age at the time the visual material was created.”

As Variety explains:

To be illegal, such material must appeal “to the prurient interest in sex” and have “no serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”

Netflix Cuties

Meanwhile, Netflix has since stood by the movie, saying:

“‘Cuties’ is a social commentary against the sexualization of young children. This charge is without merit and we stand by the film.”

Of course, it’s not likely that anyone is going to prison here and if things don’t go their way, the streaming giant will probably just have to pay some hefty fines and maybe even remove Cuties from the platform. But right now, it’s too early to say how this will all unfold.

Clearly, though, the controversy swirling around the film is here to stay for a while yet and no matter which side of the fence you fall on, it’s hard not to feel bad for director Maïmouna Doucouré, who obviously didn’t expect or want any of this and now finds herself caught up in a pretty big mess, even receiving death threats from some.

Tell us, though, what do you make of this situation? Is the state of Texas right to indict Netflix? As always, sound off below with your thoughts.



from Movies – We Got This Covered https://ift.tt/36Dv02J